Crosscall Stellar-X5
Характеристики
фронт. камера: 16 МП
Price comparison
Обзоры Crosscall Stellar-X5
Источник: DxOMark
EN→RUThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 17 September 2024
Источник: DxOMark
EN→RUThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 11 June 2024
Источник: DxOMark
EN→RUThe Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 04 June 2024
Комментарий
Qualcomm Adreno 710: Графический чип для смартфонов и планшетов, интегрированный в SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. По данным Qualcomm, он в 2 раза быстрее, чем старый Adreno 644 в Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.
Графические процессоры этой категории производительности справятся лишь с самыми простыми играми, больше подходя для простых дел - просмотра видео в Сети и обработки документов. Плюсом можно считать скромный нагрев и расход энергии.
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг видеокарт.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC среднего класса с 8 ядрами Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 с частотой 2,2 ГГц, 4x ARM Cortex A55 с частотой 1,8) и модемом X62 5G (скорость загрузки до 2900 Мбит/с). Чип производится по современному 4-нм техпроцессу.
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг процессоров.
6.58": Число смартфонов со столь немалой диагональю увеличивается в последние годы. Они расходуют больше энергии и менее охотно умещаются в кармане, но взамен многие считают их более удобными в обращении, особенно для таких применений, как игры.
>> Больше сведений: Рейтинг ноутбуков по качеству дисплея.
Вся информация - в наших подробных обзорах.
