Samsung Galaxy J3
Характеристики
Price comparison
Усреднено 14 оценок (из 21 обзоров)
Обзоры Samsung Galaxy J3
Источник: Bit-Tech EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a great budget smartphone. It’s reasonably well made and has a great screen that leaves us wondering why more manufacturers don’t specify AMOLED panels on their cheap handsets.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 01 December 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 83%
Источник: Techradar EN→RU Archive.org version
With a bright screen and slim design the Samsung Galaxy J3 makes a good first impression, but annoyances like a lack of auto brightness hold it back from greatness.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 16 September 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: GSM Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) is one of those devices that will likely end up free-on-contract or a similar carrier-subsidized deal. There really isn't all that much about the handset to leave a lasting impression. Now that the J2 (2016) is officially out, this became even more apparent, as the two devices are identical hardware-wise and price-wise, only the J2 has the added novelty of Samsung's new Smart Glow notifications.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 17 July 2016
Источник: Expert Reviews EN→RU Archive.org version
Of course, there's also the 3rd Gen Moto G to consider as well. This is just as fast as the J5 and has one of the best budget cameras we've ever seen. It also runs the latest version of Android 6.0, making it feel newer and more up to date than Samsung's J series, all of which only run Android 5.1.1. Samsung's notoriously bad at providing its cheaper handsets with free OTA updates for newer versions of Android, so those that want all the latest Android features such as Doze and Now on Tap should probably pick the Moto G instead. For me, the Moto G is still our favourite budget smartphone, but if you're not fussed about what version of Android you're running and value having a long battery life, then Samsung's Galaxy J5 is still the J series phone to buy.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 12 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Laptop Media EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup cannot boast with the same premium looks of the Galaxy S or Galaxy A models, but compensates this with a price that’s easy on your budget. This is exactly the case with the Galaxy J3 (2016) which comes at a reasonable price and, at the same time, provides all necessary features for a mid-range smartphone. Such components are the 5″ Super AMOLED HD display with high contrast and detailed image. Also impressing is the battery which performed more than well in our tests, despite its not so great capacity.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 21 May 2016
Источник: PC Mag EN→RU Archive.org version
If you're looking for an affordable phone on a major carrier, you typically need to prepare to make a compromise. The $169.99 (full price) Samsung Galaxy J3 on AT&T doesn't buck this trend, but unlike many other affordable smartphones, you won't be compromising on software. The J3 runs the latest version of Android, 6.0 Marshmallow, which is more than you can say for even plenty of higher-end devices. It also boasts a rich 5-inch 720p AMOLED display and great battery life, making it a solid choice for AT&T customers shopping on a budget.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 10 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70%
Источник: PC Pro EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a great budget smartphone. It’s reasonably well made and has a great screen that leaves me wondering why more manufacturers don’t specify AMOLED panels on their cheap handsets. The biggest problem the Galaxy J3 faces is the fact that its stablemate, the Galaxy J5, is better. That phone is not only faster, but also has a slightly better camera, a marginally bigger screen and better battery life than the J3. For a mere £10 extra, you can’t argue with the fact that it’s the better buy.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 09 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80%
Источник: Expert Reviews EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is certainly a respectable budget smartphone for £150, but with very little difference compared to the Galaxy J5 in terms of price - just £10 at the time of writing - I can't think of any reason why you'd pick this instead. Both have an excellent display, but the Galaxy J5 is faster, longer lasting and has a far superior camera, making it much better value overall.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 25 April 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Tech Advisor EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a no-frills phone that will suit many users needs, but it's not quite cheap enough for our liking. At £150 it is underpowered and under-featured, though we like the microSD support and removable battery.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 25 April 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60% Стоимость: 60% Производительность: 60% Оснащение: 70% Внешний вид: 70%
Источник: Expert Reviews EN→RU Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is certainly a respectable budget smartphone for £150, but with very little difference compared to the Galaxy J5 in terms of price - just £10 at the time of writing - I can't think of any reason why you'd pick this instead. Both have an excellent display, but the Galaxy J5 is faster, longer lasting and has a far superior camera, making it much better value overall.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 25 April 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Fone Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
At a price tag of Rs. 8,990, the Galaxy J3 (2016) is just an average budget 4G smartphone from Samsung. It comes with a good Super AMOLED display for the price, has 4G support and has unique S bike mode along with NFC, but Samsung has missed out the ambient light sensor for auto brightness adjustment, yet again and the performance is also not the best. Even though these is an 8-megapixel camera, the quality could have been better and just 4GB of usable storage is definitely not enough.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 18 April 2016
Источник: Tom's Guide EN→RU Archive.org version
The J3's strengths — its battery life and appealing exterior — can't obscure the device's glaring weaknesses. Even if you can overlook the phone's subpar performance, the blurry images taken by the J3's camera just aren't acceptable in an era when even low-priced phones feature cameras that can take sharper images.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 17 April 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 50%
Источник: Chip.de DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 15 December 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 63% Производительность: 73% Оснащение: 42% Качество экрана: 84% Портативность: 63%
Источник: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 October 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 84% Портативность: 76%
Источник: Chinahandys.net DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 06 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70% Производительность: 60% Качество экрана: 70% Портативность: 70% Внешний вид: 70%
Источник: Netzwelt DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 01 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 62% Оснащение: 60% Портативность: 70% Внешний вид: 70%
Источник: A1 Blog DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 14 June 2016
Источник: Computerbild - Heft 11/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 June 2016
Источник: Computerhoy ES→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 16 December 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 72% Стоимость: 80% Оснащение: 60% Качество экрана: 80% Портативность: 80% Внешний вид: 70%
Источник: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 04 December 2016
Источник: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 27 July 2016
Комментарий
ARM Mali-400 MP2:
Графические процессоры этой категории производительности совершенно не подходят для игр. Скорее всего, даже в повседневных делах пользователь столкнётся с ограничениями, такими, как отсутствие аппаратного декодирования видео или невозможность подключения монитора с актуальным разрешением.
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг видеокарт.
SC8830:
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг процессоров.
5.00": Несколько лет назад такая диагональ считалась обычной для смартфона. Сегодня многие называют подобные смартфоны "компактными". Используются дисплеи такого размера и в портативных игровых приставках.
>> Больше сведений: Рейтинг ноутбуков по качеству дисплея.
66.71%: Плохой товар. Не рекомендуется к приобретению без самой крайней необходимости!
Вся информация - в наших подробных обзорах.