Sony Xperia X
Характеристики
фронт. камера: 13 МП f/2.0, video recording up to 1080p
Price comparison
Усреднено 55 оценок (из 95 обзоров)
Обзоры Sony Xperia X
На амбициях. С новым Sony Xperia X японский производитель пытается убить двух зайцев - тут вам и топовый флагман и камерофон в одном лице. И хоть этот пятидюймовый аппарат на Android обладает множеством интересных фишек и высокой производительностью, он не дотягивает до высокой планки того имиджа, что сам задает.
Источник: Tech Girl EN→RU Archive.org version
Get the Sony Xperia X if you are into taking selfies, want a high quality camera and a screen display that will surprise you every time you look at it. And the two day battery life is a real plus.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 01 March 2017
Источник: Tech Nave EN→RU Archive.org version
To many, a smartphone is their gateway to the world-wide web, and the Sony Xperia X is a good window to that world if a user invests in getting a unit for themselves. It has its ups and downs, but overall it is a good phone to recommend to anyone particularly if you're a fan of Sony Xperia phones and those with dedicated camera shutter buttons.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 11 November 2016
Источник: ITP EN→RU Archive.org version
Sony would like to position the Xperia X as a mid-range phone albeit with some serious premium credentials. They’ve largely succeeded. The work done with the camera is commendable and will only get better as the predictive hybrid autofocus advances. Actually it shares most of the features with the premium Xperia Z series but with a more pocket-friendly price tag.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 14 September 2016
Источник: Unbox EN→RU Archive.org version
Overall, the Xperia X is a great device and we had a good time taking it around as our daily driver. It handled day-to-day tasks we threw at it easily, it’s main and secondary camera perform well, and — despite the size — has pretty decent battery life. But, it’s really the price that has us wincing a little. The Sony Xperia X is priced at Php 29,990 and we can already feel your inner keyboard warrior’s spirit rising up to leave a comment.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 25 August 2016
Источник: Laptop Media EN→RU Archive.org version
Some might reproach Sony for choosing Snapdragon 650 mobile CPU instead of the top-notch Snapdragon 820, for example. However, the mobile chip in Xperia X not only did well in terms of performance but also kept reasonable exterior temperatures after our stress test. What’s more, this CPU seems to be gentle on the battery because its seemingly small capacity of 2630 mAh displayed decent durability. Also, the 23MP camera does not have 4K video recording but it offers many manual settings and fascinating modes.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 31 July 2016
Источник: What Mobile EN→RU Archive.org version
A lot of weird decisions have been made since the Xperia X was announced. First of all the marketing has been poor with many, including us, were led to believe that the Xperia X range was to be released alongside the Xperia Z range. The spec sheet we thought corroborated this thought as none of the Xperia X devices use Qualcomm’s latest and greatest, the Snapdragon 820 at the time.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 14 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60% Стоимость: 30% Производительность: 60% Качество экрана: 80% Внешний вид: 80%
Источник: Expert Reviews EN→RU Archive.org version
This is a real shame, as the rest of the phone holds up well to its closest competitors. However, if the camera wasn't enough to hold the Xperia X back, its price definitely is, as it currently costs £460 SIM-free or around £32-per-month on contract. This puts it in direct competition with the LG G5, which not only has a vastly superior camera – arguably the best out of all of this year's flagship smarpthones – but it also has an equally gorgeous-looking screen and bundles of speed. When you put these phones side-by-side, the G5 wins hands down.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 07 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: V3.co.uk EN→RU Archive.org version
Whichever way you cut it, the Xperia X is a woefully overpriced handset. Coupled with the performance problems and dull design, there's just not enough here to justify that high price and make it a handset to recommend.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 07 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 40%
Источник: Engadget EN→RU Archive.org version
Sony, what are you doing? Though the $700 Xperia X Performance features a flagship-level processor and runs well as a result, Sony apparently didn't feel the need to bring anything new to the table. What we have here is a reasonably good smartphone that lacks soul or ambition, and ultimately costs too much for what it is.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 01 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 72%
Источник: Pocket Lint EN→RU Archive.org version
Additionally the X is underminded by the more exciting edge-to-edge display of Sony's own Xperia XA, lacks the waterproofing of the Xperia Z5, while many of its features are average compared to the advancing and competitive world of mid-range handsets. So while the Xperia X doesn't really do much wrong and is a potentially solid choice, it's the surrounding competition and lack of cohesion in the range that stop it being top pick.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 28 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70%
Источник: Phone Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
With its more elegant body, better camera, faster chipset, and record LTE band support, the iPhone 6s seems destined to remain the popular choice compared to the Xperia X. Moreover, Sony priced its midranger just a hundred lower than the iPhone 6s, which wouldn't help its cause at all.
Обзор-сравнение, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 24 June 2016
Источник: It Pro EN→RU Archive.org version
Sony’s smartphone efforts are in trouble. It’s hard to tell what’s smaller - Sony Mobile’s profits or its share of the smartphone market. It’s not quite the excellent phone Sony says it is, but the Xperia X is still a good alternative to the Galaxy S7 and LG G5 as well as a step up from the Nexus 5X.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 21 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80%
Источник: Pocketnow EN→RU Archive.org version
The X is a tricky phone to pin down. Sony’s mission here is to trim the fat, walking away from some of the more outlandish hardware specs and feature creeping our phones are experiencing. Instead we see Sony engineers trying to scale back and refine specifically those hardware elements which they believe truly affect consumer use.
video review
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 18 June 2016
Источник: Tech2.in.com EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X was announced at Rs 48,999 and is currently selling for about Rs 46,000 on Amazon.in. Now there has been a quick drop in the price, but it is still a very high amount. The smartphone is very well made and offers a sturdy performance package but not for the price that Sony is asking.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 17 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70% Производительность: 70% Оснащение: 60% Портативность: 75% Внешний вид: 75%
Источник: PC Mag EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X is a capable midrange phone with a good camera, but that shouldn't add up to a $550 price tag. It lacks waterproofing, which has distinguished the Xperia line for so long. And it can't compete with higher-end phones like the HTC 10 or the Galaxy S7 in terms of display quality, camera, or performance. Ultimately, you're better off saving $150 and picking up the OnePlus 3, which gets you a faster processor and much longer battery life. The Blu Life One X$149.99 at Amazon, meanwhile, isn't quite as powerful, but offers terrific value for the price.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 17 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: NDTV Gadgets EN→RU Archive.org version
Sony's new flagship Xperia X Dual gives us mixed feelings. It's a beautiful device that's built well, has a good screen and sports a feature-filled camera that takes good pictures in most conditions. Unfortunately, there are serious flaws as well, with heating issues that cause crashes, lags and app shutdowns, as well as a fingerprint sensor that often falters. The software is a bit bothersome as well, and the UI is not the most easy to use or customisable.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 17 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70% Стоимость: 50% Производительность: 60% Качество экрана: 80% Портативность: 70% Внешний вид: 80%
Источник: Tech Advisor EN→RU Archive.org version
We wish we could rate the Sony Xperia X more highly than we have. It has a stunning design with a screen size ideal for those who prefer the smaller end of the spectrum. The 5in screen is the sweet-spot for us here. It also offers a great battery life, a brilliant camera and performance that should satisfy the majority of users.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 16 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70% Стоимость: 50% Производительность: 50% Оснащение: 70% Внешний вид: 80%
Источник: Android Authority EN→RU Archive.org version
Considering that phones like the G5 and the S7 come with higher resolution displays and the Snapdragon 820, the Xperia X is a tough sell at these prices. However, you may find it available with a good deal via your carrier, and so negating the high off-contract price. If you are a Sony fan or you are looking to upgrade from a Xperia Z device and want to stick with Sony then the Xperia X could just be what you are looking for.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 16 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 84% Производительность: 80% Качество экрана: 85% Портативность: 85% Внешний вид: 80%
Источник: Gadgetspeak EN→RU Archive.org version
With dimensions of 143 x 69 x 7.7 mm (H x W x D) and weighing 152g, the Xperia X is Sony’s latest entry into the rather overcrowded smartphone market sector. The Sony Xperia X handset is currently available in a choice of colours. The user can select from models coloured White, Graphite Black, Lime, Gold and Rose Gold.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 11 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80% Стоимость: 80% Производительность: 80%
Источник: Phone Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
Available for order at $549.99, the Xperia X is a smartphone that doesn't disappoint, but feels a bit too expensive for what it offers. And thanks to its seniority, the Xperia Z5 is dangerously close in terms of pricing—nowadays you can score one for as little as $600. Taking these prices in mind, we're unable to recommend the Xperia X over the Z5. We like the way it feels in our hand better, sure, and its display is truly summer-proof, but in terms of camera and game performance, it's just not quite up there. The Z5 also comes with a great perk: water protection. A saving grace is the X's better battery life, but we didn't find that to be large enough of a lead to warrant a reconsideration on our part.
Обзор-сравнение, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 10 June 2016
Источник: Phone Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
The Xperia X feels a bit pricey, especially in this fiercely competitive market. Its display might look good to lay-men, but upon closer inspection, you’d notice that it's a bit bluish and colors are not well-balanced; its Snapdragon 650 is a noticeable step below the Snapdragon 820, which will be noticed for those who edit pictures, browse the web a lot, and play games on their phones. And then, the image quality and camera experience is a bit below expectations. It also lacks catchy new features that the Galaxy S7 has aplenty in the form of Motion Photo, Always-on Display, Game Center, and so on.
Обзор-сравнение, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 08 June 2016
Источник: Androidbeat EN→RU Archive.org version
At the end of each review period it’s telling to examine my own emotions in terms of returning a handset to the relevant press office. With the HTC 10 I had to have the device prised from my enthusiastic hands, while I couldn’t wait to throw the sharp-edged, poorly-finished LG G5 back in the box and get it out of the house. The Sony Xperia X elicits… no emotion at all. If it stayed here then it would be in a drawer – it’s a premium-priced Android mid-ranger with no unique selling point whatsoever other than the Sony brand.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 07 June 2016
Источник: Greenbot EN→RU Archive.org version
If you’re absolutely committed to Sony hardware, and are desperately aching to put one of the company’s smartphones back into your hands, I suggest you wait until the Xperia X is at least $100 cheaper. Otherwise, I would just buy a Nexus 5X or 6P, both of which have working fingerprint sensors, and promise the fastest OS and security updates in the Android universe.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 06 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Think Digit EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X has a decent display, good build and reasonably decent performance and battery life, but it is simply not flagship class. At Rs. 48,990, you inevitably have better options out there.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 02 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 78%
Источник: Phone Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
An edge in a world of round, the Sony Xperia X is a familiarly, but still rather uniquely, designed smartphone that we can't help but feel attracted to. It doesn't look or feel mellow at all, but it isn't overly imposing as are the likes of the HTC 10. It's balanced, really, and comes across as approachable. A nice blend, and a decent job from the Sony design team. We would have loved a more grippy texture for the back, though.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 02 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Engadget EN→RU Archive.org version
So far the Xperia X feels like a mixed bag, but surprisingly enough, it's the mid-range Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 that makes the phone feel so premium. It's a hexa-core chipset in the vein of the classic Snapdragon 808, albeit with two cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and four clocked at 1.4GHz.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 31 May 2016
Источник: AnandTech EN→RU Archive.org version
Overall, the results I’ve seen so far from the Xperia X are concerning. The asking price is well within range of a flagship smartphone, but I’m just not seeing where the phone can justify its asking price so far. I don't really have anything against Sony here, but I'm definitely feeling let down given the praise that I've often seen around Sony phones.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 31 May 2016
Источник: Tom's Guide EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X is a very good option for shutterbugs and gamers. The Remote Play feature will delight PS4 owners, while the phone's excellent cameras will please smartphone photographers. Plus, the Xperia X offers long battery life. Too bad Sony continues to stuff a bit too much bloat into its phones.
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 31 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70%
Источник: PC Pro EN→RU Archive.org version
The most damning thing, though, is that the LG G5 is cheaper, faster, has a better camera (plus a bonus extra wide-angle camera) and a removable battery – and a lower price. Should you buy the Xperia X, then? Only if the price comes down significantly.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 31 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Cool Smartphone EN→RU Archive.org version
There is a new Sony hitting the shelves today, it is the much awaited Xperia X that was announced at MWC 16. This is slightly scaled down version of what went before in the form of the Xperia Z5 range. It shares a lot of features of its older sibling in that they both have very similar design language, with some subtle changes. We had a very brief hands-on with some early prototypes of the devices when we were in Barcelona and since then we have seen an insight into what was to come in the form of the Xperia Z5 Software update to Marshmallow.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 27 May 2016
Источник: PC Pro EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X is an odd fish. In its own right, it’s a very good smartphone, with lovely design, decent battery life and performance, a great screen and (in some circumstances) an impressive set of cameras. Yet, given its specifications, it’s entirely the wrong price. The Nexus 5X, although not quite the looker the Sony Xperia X is, starts at £160 less and has similar levels of performance. The OnePlus 2’s camera isn’t as good as the Sony’s, but it has a superior specification, double the storage and costs £210 less.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 27 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: Stuff TV EN→RU Archive.org version
Want the latest and greatest that phones have to offer? Or a startling smartphone bargain? You won’t get either of those with the Sony Xperia X. It’s a sign the company has lost some of its confidence and realised that fighting with Samsung and Apple at their own game isn’t working any more. We can’t really blame it. None of which means that the Xperia X is a remotely bad phone, because it's not. Like a merging of the old Xperia Z and Compact lines, it has an all-new accessible frame with a price that’s significantly lower than some of the competition.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 27 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80%
Источник: Recombu EN→RU Archive.org version
The Xperia X is a curious endeavor from Sony, a flagship phone that willingly skimps here and there in order to undercut rival handsets. And while some might bemoan the lack of Snapdragon 820 action, or how the water resistance is a thing of the past, the Xperia X still ticks all of the boxes for a flagship device. Slick design? Yep. Gorgeous screen and an all-round fantastic media experience? Sure. Reliable camera tech? Definitely. And despite that ‘cut back’ processor, you still get silky smooth performance as well as decent battery life.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 26 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 90%
Источник: Expert Reviews EN→RU Archive.org version
This is a real shame, as the rest of the phone holds up well to its closest competitors. However, if the camera wasn't enough to hold the Xperia X back, its price definitely is, as it currently costs £460 SIM-free or around £32-per-month on contract. This puts it in direct competition with the LG G5, which not only has a vastly superior camera – arguably the best out of all of this year's flagship smarpthones – but it also has an equally gorgeous-looking screen and bundles of speed. When you put these phones side-by-side, the G5 wins hands down.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 25 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: GSM Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X is a high-quality phone and if this is where the story ended, all would have been fine. But no, Sony decided to overhaul its well-known flagship lineup, mid- and low-end too, and replace them all with the X-series. The Xperia X Performance is clearly eyeing the Z5's spot at the top. And the XA Ultra is the C6 Ultra in all but name. But where is the Z5 Compact's successor? And how come the Xperia X takes over from the M-series, but at a much higher price tag?
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 20 May 2016
Источник: Techradar EN→RU Archive.org version
But dig a little bit deeper and you'll see a phone that's wanted to come out and play for a while, but it couldn't because the other kids in school were having none of it. Then it grew up and got much better looking BECAUSE it was alternative, and suddenly the world was very much interested in what this handsome hunk of tech has to say.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 15 May 2016
Источник: GSM Arena EN→RU Archive.org version
The Xperia resolves a bit more detail on a pixel level, which is clearly visible in the thinnest of twigs, and tiniest of leaves on the row of images below. Then again, noise is abundant even in brightly lit areas - likely left there deliberately, so noise reduction wouldn't do away with detail. The noise pattern is not that nice to look at (same as on the Xperia Z5), but you would probably never attempt to pixel peep on your photos from so close in real life.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 18 April 2016
Источник: PC Pro EN→RU Archive.org version
Both Sony Xperia X handsets will be available in the summer of 2016, but predictably, there’s no word yet on prices. I’d hope that the X will be cheaper than the X Performance, and the X Performance cheaper than the Xperia Z5. If it is, Sony could be onto a winner. If it isn't, it'll be a disappointment.
Обзор-сравнение, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 22 February 2016
Источник: Trusted Reviews EN→RU Archive.org version
Now, it isn’t meant to replace the Z series, but there are certainly similarities between the two. Aside from the mid-range Xperia XA, the X and X Performance are aiming to offer both impressive cameras and long-lasting batteries in a fairly compact body.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 22 February 2016
Источник: Pocket Lint EN→RU Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia X is a lovely looking smartphone that brings a premium appeal, hopefully without the premium price tag. It has a great finish with a slender design but it doesn't stray from the look Sony smartphones are associated with, which is nice. These are subtle changes, but we think this series is a teaser for the next Xperia flagship design.
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 21 February 2016
Источник: Android Mag DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 01 January 2017
Рейтинг: Итого: 95% Стоимость: 75% Производительность: 100% Оснащение: 100% Качество экрана: 100% Портативность: 60% Внешний вид: 100% Эргономичность: 80%
Источник: Android Mag DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 26 October 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 95% Стоимость: 78% Производительность: 100% Оснащение: 100% Качество экрана: 100% Портативность: 60% Внешний вид: 100%
Источник: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 October 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 86% Портативность: 73%
Источник: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 05/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 September 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 96%
Источник: Connect - Heft 10/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 September 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 87%
Источник: Android Mag DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 24 August 2016
Источник: Area DVD DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 04 August 2016
Источник: Chip.de DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 27 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 89% Стоимость: 79% Производительность: 97% Оснащение: 86% Качество экрана: 95% Портативность: 74%
Источник: Futurezone.at DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 25 July 2016
Источник: Smart Web DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 22 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 90% Оснащение: 88% Качество экрана: 90%
Источник: Technik Surfer DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 02 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 72% Стоимость: 70% Производительность: 60% Портативность: 60% Внешний вид: 90% Эргономичность: 80%
Источник: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 93%
Источник: Connect - Heft 8/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 87%
Источник: e-media - Heft 08/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80%
Источник: Android Mag DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 19 June 2016
Источник: Turn On DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 16 June 2016
Источник: c't - Heft 13/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 15 June 2016
Источник: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 13 June 2016
Источник: PCtipp.ch DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 09 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80%
Источник: Verivox DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 08 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 76% Оснащение: 80%
Источник: Blick DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 02 June 2016
Источник: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 02 June 2016
Источник: Basic Tutorials - Heft 7/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 74%
Источник: Computerbild - Heft 11/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 89%
Источник: Technik Surfer - Heft 07/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 71%
Источник: SFT - Heft 7/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 96%
Источник: Android Pit DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 01 June 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70%
Источник: PC Welt DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 25 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 90% Производительность: 87% Оснащение: 97% Качество экрана: 93%
Источник: Teltarif DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 24 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 93% Оснащение: 90% Внешний вид: 96% Эргономичность: 93%
Источник: A1 Blog DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 20 May 2016
Источник: Curved DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 19 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 84% Производительность: 80% Качество экрана: 80% Портативность: 83%
Источник: n-tv DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 19 May 2016
Источник: Inside Handy DE→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 13 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 81%
Источник: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 May 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 100%
Источник: Areamobile - Heft 6/2016
Классический обзор, , длина не указана, Дата: 01 May 2016
Источник: Sin Celular ES→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 02 June 2017
Источник: Teknofilo ES→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 03 July 2016
Источник: Target HD PT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 18 January 2017
Источник: Tecnologia.com.pt PT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 03 October 2016
Источник: Android Geek PT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 16 August 2016
Источник: 4G News PT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 03 August 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 81% Стоимость: 70% Производительность: 85% Качество экрана: 80% Портативность: 85% Внешний вид: 80%
Источник: InstaNews IT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 12 March 2017
Источник: Smartphone Italia IT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 05 December 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60% Оснащение: 70% Качество экрана: 80% Портативность: 50% Эргономичность: 80%
Источник: Smartphone Italia IT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 28 November 2016
Источник: Optima IT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 18 November 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 78% Качество экрана: 90% Портативность: 80% Внешний вид: 80%
Источник: AndroidPit.it IT→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 01 July 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70%
Источник: Computer Totaal NL→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 25 August 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: All About Phones NL→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. большой длины, Дата: 16 August 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 70%
Источник: Top for Phone FR→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 02 October 2016
Источник: Phonandroid FR→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 18 September 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 80%
Источник: Les Mobiles FR→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 04 September 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 76%
Источник: Komputerswiat PL→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 31 January 2018
Рейтинг: Итого: 84%
Источник: Chip Online TR TR→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 08 September 2016
Рейтинг: Итого: 87% Производительность: 98% Оснащение: 88% Качество экрана: 95%
Источник: HWSW HU→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, оч. малой длины, Дата: 22 August 2016
Источник: CNews.cz CZ→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 19 August 2016
Комментарий
Qualcomm Adreno 510:
Графические процессоры этой категории производительности практически не подходят дли игр, но справятся с самыми простыми делами, вроде отображения 2D-материала на экране умеренного разрешения.
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг видеокарт.
650 MSM8956:
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг процессоров.
5.00": Несколько лет назад такая диагональ считалась обычной для смартфона. Сегодня многие называют подобные смартфоны "компактными". Используются дисплеи такого размера и в портативных игровых приставках.
>> Больше сведений: Рейтинг ноутбуков по качеству дисплея.
77.08%: Посредственный товар. Его недостатки слишком значительны, а цена слишком велика на фоне того, что предлагается потенциальному покупателю взамен. Если есть возможность, лучше поискать более удачный вариант.
Вся информация - в наших подробных обзорах.